Sue The WHO
Global Citizens Demanding Accountability for Void Authorizations
Time-sensitive
--
Days
--
Hours
--
Minutes
--
Seconds
Global Citizens Demanding Accountability for Void Authorizations
They scheduled all of this in the same window hoping nobody would still be paying attention. Look at the calendar.
The Director-General's Standing Recommendations on COVID-19 — the operational backbone for two and a half years of mandates and emergency authorities — expire on April 30. Watch what replaces them.
The Resumed Sixth Meeting of the Intergovernmental Working Group is in session in Geneva. Five days to lock the Pathogen Access and Benefit-Sharing annex before WHA. Wire reports describe progress as slow — that is exactly why pressure now matters.
WHA79 votes on the PABS annex. The September 2025 IHR amendments are already in force. The architecture they need is one signature away from being complete.
"Three filings, three jurisdictions, three deadlines, all converging in twenty days. We are still paying attention."
When you sign, you are signing for these three things. Specific. Legally grounded. Tied directly to filings already moving in federal court, in Costa Rica, and on the FDA docket.
The Pathogen Access and Benefit-Sharing system creates a global surveillance pipeline that activates the moment a "pathogen of pandemic potential" is sequenced — regardless of whether the equity guarantees ever materialize. Member-state delegations must be instructed to vote NO on May 18.
The 2024 amendments to the International Health Regulations entered into force on September 19, 2025, requiring every state party to establish a National IHR Authority and creating a new "pandemic emergency" alert level. These amendments were adopted without a single full reading on the assembly floor. Rescind acceptance.
The Nuremberg Code's first principle — free and informed consent without coercion — is customary international law that rises to the level of jus cogens: peremptory norms from which no derogation is permitted. The ICCPR is binding treaty law. The Universal Declaration of Bioethics and Human Rights is the consensus framework. No international body has the legal authority to adopt instruments that compel violation of these norms — to do so is ultra vires.
Your signature is delivered to the WHO and to your country's delegation in real time. Each name documents the public record on jus cogens. This is not symbolic — this is how international law gets enforced.
Dear Honorable Delegate to the 79th World Health Assembly,
I am writing as a concerned citizen on the eve of WHA79. Time is short. Geneva PABS negotiations are closing. The vote is May 18.
I demand three things from you and your delegation.
ONE — VOTE NO on the PABS annex. The Pathogen Access and Benefit-Sharing system creates a global surveillance pipeline that activates whenever a "pathogen of pandemic potential" is sequenced. The equity guarantees do not change that fundamental architecture. Reject it.
TWO — REJECT the September 2025 IHR Amendments. These amendments entered into force without a single full reading on the assembly floor. They require every state party to establish a National IHR Authority. They create a new "pandemic emergency" alert level. Rescind acceptance.
THREE — HOLD THE WHO ACCOUNTABLE under the Nuremberg Code and the ICCPR. The Nuremberg Code's first principle of voluntary, informed consent is binding customary international law. The ICCPR is binding treaty law. Both were violated globally during the WHO-coordinated pandemic response. International institutions are not above international law.
No international body, including the WHO, has the legal authority to adopt instruments that compel or facilitate violation of jus cogens norms. To do so is ultra vires — beyond legal capacity. Such instruments are voidable from inception, and the procedural defects in the September 2025 IHR adoption process compound the substantive violations.
Citizens worldwide are watching, organizing, and prepared to support every available judicial mechanism — domestic and international — if these instruments are adopted in their current form. Legal accountability follows precedent. The precedent here is clear.
Your country joined the WHO under sovereign authority. That same authority lets you withdraw acceptance of harmful instruments. Use it.
Respectfully,
[Your name]
[Your country]
[Today's date]
Your name has been added to the public petition record. Signatures are being delivered to the WHO and member-state delegations as a single consolidated communication — that's how diplomatic petitions get read, not auto-routed individual letters that get spam-filtered. Your name is on the record.
← See your name on the public wall of signatures
Pressure works when it's sustained. Here's the support side — what funds the campaign behind this petition.
We are one of the last organizations actually filing against the WHO. Not commenting. Not posting. Filing — in federal court, in Costa Rica, on the FDA docket.
Three filings are moving right now. Court fees, hours of legal research, travel to hearings, certified mailings, exhibit copies, translation costs in Costa Rica — it stacks fast. Xylie is filing pro se. She is not on her own dime if you act.
It's not over yet. Don't let it be.
Click any preset to pre-fill, OR type any custom amount directly in the donation form below — every dollar fuels the next filing.
Prefer the full donate page? interestofjustice.org/donate